> The court doesn't agree, and they've explicitly pointed out that 4A still applies when someone is being monitored and tracked in public. Only when that track

> The court doesn't agree, and they've explicitly pointed out that 4A still applies when someone is being monitored and tracked in public. Only when that tracking is done via cell phone location information. The Carpenter decision did not apply this to all forms of public monitoring. You keep ignoring the fact that the decision was narrowly scoped to cell phone location data, and continue to erroneously claim that it applied to public tracking in general.