5 ms·
> There's no reason for that person to be allowed to operate a vehicle Doesn't much of america outside of cities also have the secondary problem of you physica
by kay_o 7d ago
> There's no reason for that person to be allowed to operate a vehicle
Doesn't much of america outside of cities also have the secondary problem of you physically cannot feed yourself, get to appointments, or do anything without operating a vehicle?
- fn-mote 7d agoAt some point the cost has to be high enough to get the attention of the offender. I hope you wouldn’t be saying this if they had killed someone in one of their crashes. How about injured? They must have. Get some standards instead of saying everything is ok.
- kay_o 7d agoI am not saying anything is ok, where did you read that?
- dml2135 7d agoSounds like a great incentive to make sure you don’t lose your driving privileges.
- Sl1mb0 7d agoOr maybe - build a world where you don't need driving privileges just to exist
- amanaplanacanal 7d agoThat is certainly something we have done horribly wrong in most of the US.
- kkkqkqkqkqlqlql 6d agoOr to lobby to make sure driving is an inalienable right. Which path are you seeing being realized in the US?
- pjc50 7d ago> you physically cannot feed yourself, get to appointments, or do anything without operating a vehicle? You also physically cannot feed yourself, get to appointments, or do anything else once you've been fatally run over by a vehicle.