4 ms·
What if open-ended agents are overkill for 99% of problems? Let's just take that premise for a second. Most organizations want to follow "best practices" and tr
by EGreg 7d ago
What if open-ended agents are overkill for 99% of problems? Let's just take that premise for a second. Most organizations want to follow "best practices" and train their employees to do so. Hiring a genius and giving him total freedom to complete every task is not what companies usually want for MOST things. They want repeatability, reliability, predictability. Especially if they are regulated.
I'm going to drop a bomb over here: what if agents are the root of all our problems in AI safety, cost, and even adoption by regulated organizations? I really do believe this. Here is what I argue:
https://safebots.ai/agents.html https://safebots.ai/agents.html
https://safebots.ai/kimi.html https://safebots.ai/kimi.html
And here is my overall thesis:
https://safebots.ai/thesis.html https://safebots.ai/thesis.html
If you do manage to read (or skim) that, I welcome any questions, comments or rebuttals.
- guybedo 7d agoyour load-bearing thesis is probably interesting but it seems i can't read AI written text anymore -- or maybe i just need some more coffee.
- EGreg 7d agoim happy for you tho, or sorry that happened
- conception 7d agoDon't post generated text or AI-edited text. HN is for conversation between humans.
- horacemorace 7d agoI also believe that, but also can’t follow LLM copy.