5 ms·
The OpenAI team didn't make a Lean proof. They brute forced a counter example. The "other" team was doing what you described but they haven't "finished" their
by hunterpayne 7d ago
The OpenAI team didn't make a Lean proof. They brute forced a counter example. The "other" team was doing what you described but they haven't "finished" their work yet. Also, their Lean proof was for a simpler version of the problem, not the full NS.
Also, OpenAI wanted the actual mathematician taken off the resulting paper. I'm not sure I would describe what OpenAI did as research. What the other team was doing does seem to be more like research but the hardware was still in those cases mostly brute forcing things and then doing something like a genetic algorithm to compose an actual proof based upon the results of a large set of brute force attempts.
- eieje1 7d ago[dead]
- dekhn 7d agoDidn't OpenAI make a Lean proof? https://github.com/openai/NavierStokesAndEuler/tree/main/NavierStokes https://github.com/openai/NavierStokesAndEuler/tree/main/Nav... "This repository contains Lean 4 formalizations of the results presented in “Finite time blowup for Navier–Stokes” and “Finite time blowup for the Euler equation” by OpenAI."