4 ms·
Like all automations it's not 100% perfect, and they all require a human to monitor them. Turning over a problem to a LLM as solved means we won't be able to d
by treespace8 7d ago
Like all automations it's not 100% perfect, and they all require a human to monitor them.
Turning over a problem to a LLM as solved means we won't be able to do the task anymore. Because we will never learn how. We will not know that the LLM has made a mistake, and will be unable to fix it ourselves.
Right now we can correct the LLM, as the years go on we will become unable to do so.
- Dlemlo 7d agoIf you look at certain documentations, we lost already how we d othings. USA forgot how to produce things. This will not prevent us from doing it.
- Droobfest 7d agoMost people who drive a car have no idea how an engine works. I know and agree it's a scary future, but I wonder if it's really _essential_ to understand things on a deeper level. Most people are quite capable of understanding higher-order ideas without fully grasping the underlying details too.
- SirYandi 7d agoIt is essential that _someone_ knows how that car works.
- scott_weber 7d agoMaybe less than we might hope. Not only is the knowledge distributed over the hundreds of people involved in designing a car, there may be conventions/habits of design and manufacture whose purpose has become hazy but are nevertheless important, or details of a design iterated upon whose original motivation is less understood.