8 ms·
>and will be disenfranchised under Republican voter ID requirements. Can you explain this further? A person who can legally vote today, but in the future cann
by hackyhacky 8d ago
>and will be disenfranchised under Republican voter ID requirements.
Can you explain this further?
A person who can legally vote today, but in the future cannot vote because of election restrictions, will be disenfranchised. You are supporting election restrictions that disenfranchise 10% of the US population.
>>That's why 10% of the US population doesn't have form of ID that could be used to vote
>Correlation != causation
I never made a claim of causation. I just said that 10% of legal US voting-eligible citizens don't have ID and will therefore be disenfranchised by your proposal.
> They are issued automatically after proving eligibility.
That's not what "automatic" means.