5 ms·
> My previous comment was simply my attempt at deconstructing Penrose's argument, participating in the ever-ongoing popular debate. That may be so, but just th
by jacquesm 8d ago
> My previous comment was simply my attempt at deconstructing Penrose's argument, participating in the ever-ongoing popular debate.
That may be so, but just the mention of Penrose's name in the context of something else caused you to start a whole subthread that had nothing to do with the subject.
- thrance 8d agoIt was not "just the mention of Penrose's name", it was this comment specifically: > "Any explanation by Roger Penrose is bound to be good" Is something wrong with my original comment?