5 ms·
That's not it. I dont mind the article. I judge the person writing it because they are being silly. "I think I use screens too much so everyone should use scre
by procaryote 9d ago
That's not it. I dont mind the article. I judge the person writing it because they are being silly.
"I think I use screens too much so everyone should use screens less" is silly.
- Towaway69 9d ago> Don't make your addiction my problem > "I think I use screens too much so everyone should use screens less" is silly. From my perspective, I see both statements fulfilling what you're saying with: > I judge the person writing it because they are being silly. You are right, telling me not to use a screen because someone else is OD'ing on screens is silly but so is judging them for it - because it still doesn't affect me. But that's only from my, a third, perspective. I might be being pedantic but saying someone is silly because I think they are silly is silly for a third person to read because it's only my opinion without any references or background as to why this might be the case. But that might well be silly to read for a fourth perspective.
- procaryote 5d agoSo basically you think any opinion about someone else's opinion creates a paradox? And that's your opinion about an opinion?