5 ms·
>You are missing the point. No I'm not. >Even if there is no financial cost, it requires documentation and time to get voter ID. Yes, you must prove your eli
by throwawaypath 9d ago
>You are missing the point.
No I'm not.
>Even if there is no financial cost, it requires documentation and time to get voter ID.
Yes, you must prove your eligibility to vote.
>It is not issued automatically.
They are issued automatically after proving eligibility.
>That's why 10% of the US population doesn't have form of ID that could be used to vote
Correlation != causation
>and will be disenfranchised under Republican voter ID requirements.
No they won't.
>Until that issue is fixed, voter ID is not something I can support.
There are no issues to fix.
- hackyhacky 8d ago>and will be disenfranchised under Republican voter ID requirements. Can you explain this further? A person who can legally vote today, but in the future cannot vote because of election restrictions, will be disenfranchised. You are supporting election restrictions that disenfranchise 10% of the US population. >>That's why 10% of the US population doesn't have form of ID that could be used to vote >Correlation != causation I never made a claim of causation. I just said that 10% of legal US voting-eligible citizens don't have ID and will therefore be disenfranchised by your proposal. > They are issued automatically after proving eligibility. That's not what "automatic" means.