> ~98% of students flagged by pangram actually cheated That 2% is a large number! Of people who will have their integrity impugned for no good reason! That's n

> ~98% of students flagged by pangram actually cheated That 2% is a large number! Of people who will have their integrity impugned for no good reason! That's not okay! Your calculations also are mixing assignments and students. The rate of false positives of 1/10k is of corpuses, not students. 10k students might each submit 2-3 written assignments per week. Obviously, this greatly increases the impact of the false positive rate. And all of these numbers are dependent on lab conditions for usage, which are not the case in the real world. > I don't think 100% accuracy is logically possible. Yes. Which is why marketing this product as it currently is, is a deeply irresponsible endeavor.