6 ms·
Wow, that is widely disingenuous, I don't really think there is any excuse for that, I don't believe someone deep in compression algorithms wouldn't know they c
by CJefferson 10d ago
Wow, that is widely disingenuous, I don't really think there is any excuse for that, I don't believe someone deep in compression algorithms wouldn't know they could adjust the block size, and 512GB is a huge block size for bzip3, as it needs to basically all be in memory so you can't pretend that's just 'the standard value'.
- ot 10d ago> 512GB is a huge block size for bzip3 Sorry! That was a typo, it should have been 512MB (now fixed). Still huge.
- deleted 10d ago[deleted]