> the LLM tells are impossible to ignore. Bluntly, your intellectual fly is open: lots of people notice — but no one is pointing it out You are going to be lef

> the LLM tells are impossible to ignore. Bluntly, your intellectual fly is open: lots of people notice — but no one is pointing it out You are going to be left in the dust with this attitude. People using LLMs will continue to school you; not just because of your disrespectful attitude. To assume that people have not read what they've used an AI to generate is to make a number of mistakes. 1. People using (assistive) LLMs needn't cow to you due to your aesthetic rejection of LLM-generated text. It is impolite for you to assert your superiority to make them feel inferior. 2. Your aesthetic reaction to their prose is not a sufficient estimator of sufficiency. 3. These generations of LLMs are already superhuman in so many dimensions. If you focus on the color of the paint - here, the wording of their reply increase of the substance of their argument - you will have wasted their and your own time. It sounds like you are frustrated that LLMs are besting you in your field and you've chosen to trash talk on your blog to solve the problem. Should people reversing with e.g. GhidraMCP stop and focus on the LLM-generated aesthetics of a watermarked prosaic vulnerability assessment?