7 ms·
Post author here. I wanted the code to be "as generic as possible", so I had to accept the possibility of some useful thing being at address 0.
by sleirsgoevy 10d ago
Post author here. I wanted the code to be "as generic as possible", so I had to accept the possibility of some useful thing being at address 0.
- ValdikSS 8d agoI wrote an 'unlocking exploit' as a kernel module some years ago, and obfuscated it with a bit of self-modifying code. It could not make it work reliable. No matter which barries I set, I could not understand why is it not reliable, and had to remove the modifying code in the end. I guess I hit the issue you've described, and now I know. Thanks!