7 ms·
> you started this conversation with arguing against yourself How so ? Meanwhile, what you qualified as blog spam is actually proving to be written by a human
by harrouet 10d ago
> you started this conversation with arguing against yourself
How so ?
Meanwhile, what you qualified as blog spam is actually proving to be written by a human spending too much time answering your rant.
- embedding-shape 10d ago> How so ? Who said any of the parts you quoted in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49594757 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49594757? It looks like you made up all of those lines.
- harrouet 10d agoThat the concept of comments: those lines come from me. No AI (can you believe?)
- embedding-shape 10d agoHence the whole "arguing with yourself" part... Generally, we use quotes here for actual quotes, not quoting stuff we've read in other newspapers or on reddit or whatever, but real verbatim quotes. I think it used to be a proper guidelines back in the day, or at least people got really up in their arms if you used quote syntax for things that weren't actually verbatim quotes. But besides that, what's the point? Why share other's viewpoints you don't even agree with, so you can argue against them yourself? Why not wait until someone who actually has those viewpoints, share them? Or even better, why not just say nothing at all?
- toasty228 10d agoDid you create an account this morning? This trend is a good ten year old lmao