7 ms·
“Recursive” is a reasonable term because the generation N AIs will train the Generation N+1 AIs. The term “iterative” doesn’t reflect this nuance as well IMO.
by shwaj 10d ago
“Recursive” is a reasonable term because the generation N AIs will train the Generation N+1 AIs. The term “iterative” doesn’t reflect this nuance as well IMO.
- hndc 10d agoRecursion reduces each step toward a base case: each step is defined in terms of previous/simpler steps, not more advanced ones. The "recursive" in "recursive self improvement" has things precisely backward. Iteration correctly describes a process where each step is the starting point of its successive step, so it should be "iterative self improvement" but I guess that didn't sound as cool.
- shwaj 10d agoI think you’re conflating the direction of definition with the direction of evaluation. Compare the similarity of: AI(n) = improve(AI(n-1)) With: Fib(n) = Fib(n-1) + Fib(n-2) The latter is a classic example of recursion. So why isn’t the former? Edit: formatting
- linker_in 10d ago[dead]
- anthonyrstevens 8d agoI think you're confusing a recurrence relationship with recursive execution. Until AI has control over its inputs (including physical inputs - compute hardware, etc.) it's not quite RSI. We'll get there. They'll get there, rather.
- HarHarVeryFunny 10d agoIt's not a nuance, it's a sequence.
- deleted 10d ago[deleted]