4 ms·
There's nuance though. Poetry even. > we should fight for human survival All problems arise from this statement. It's baked in us and it's why we do in fact s
by apsurd 10d ago
There's nuance though. Poetry even.
> we should fight for human survival
All problems arise from this statement. It's baked in us and it's why we do in fact survive. But it isn't so neatly righteous. When we struggle to agree on what defines a human, who ought to have rights, and basic equality, it's easy to see how much harm "we should fight for survival" does.
- ekidd 10d ago> > we should fight for human survival > All problems arise from this statement. Let me go on the record, then: Given a choice between every living human being becoming absolutely, for-real dead and the human species surviving, then I come down on the side of human survival. There are too many humans that I love personally, and too many innocent people just going about their lives that I would like to protect. Given a choice between the mass death of billions, and their survival, I choose survival. Human rights are essential. But human rights are difficult to achieve if everyone is dead.
- lukewarm707 10d agoextinction is natural. we all go extinct.
- hnsr 10d agoYeah but like, maybe we can postpone it a little, by fighting :)