5 ms·
NC is a huge pain as it can be difficult to define commercial use, and it's often defined differently in different countries. https://freedomdefined.org/Licens
by RobotToaster 10d ago
NC is a huge pain as it can be difficult to define commercial use, and it's often defined differently in different countries.
https://freedomdefined.org/Licenses/NC https://freedomdefined.org/Licenses/NC
https://www.techdirt.com/2014/03/27/german-court-says-creative-commons-non-commercial-licenses-must-be-purely-personal-use/ https://www.techdirt.com/2014/03/27/german-court-says-creati...
- mark_l_watson 10d agoAnd NC doesn’t always work. I use no commercial reuse (NC) yet years ago a polite young man from China emailed me letting me know that he was translating my stuff to resell under his name for money. To be honest, I didn’t mind and it made a good story to tell friends and family.
- ghaff 10d agoI had something similar happen with a book I wrote through a publisher. I went radio silence on him. Would have required contacting my publisher and I didn't need the hassle.
- ghaff 10d agoThat's one of the reasons that defining NC broke down in the latest round of CC license revisions. Sure, even in the US, define NC as a 501(c)(3) non-profit. But that doesn't mean some mom-and-pop charity you agree with. It can easily mean a non-profit with goals you totally disagree with. And how about 501(c)(6)s like the NFL? And that's just US tax law.