8 ms·
Thanks for the explanation. It's more detailed than what's on the homepage. > it could probably support about 10x the volume Codeberg has currently with good p
by selfhoster1312 13d ago
Thanks for the explanation. It's more detailed than what's on the homepage.
> it could probably support about 10x the volume Codeberg has currently with good performance
I'm very curious about this statement since it seems to also be based on forgejo, and hosted by Hetzner. Maybe there's some forms of clever caching involved? That could explain why the monthly expenditures seem to be moving around so much, which is unusual. Do you have a link about it?
> an ideology that restricts the types of projects hosted there
That's precisely what people who don't want FLOSS say. I appreciate that some communities prevent others from restricting our freedoms; if that means restricting their capability to engage in harmful behavior (eg. non-free software, LLMs, scams, etc) that's a plus. But even codeberg is not that "strict".
> They are owned by a commercial entity, devXY but they are not profit seeking.
I will never trust a for-profit corporation to host my data, and even less so if it claims to not seek profit. If you don't seek profit, there is 0 reason to setup a for-profit company. And depending on your jurisdiction, it may actually be illegal for a for-profit to receive donations.
Thanks for taking the time to reply. I hope to be wrong and over time codefloe becomes a flourishing community full of interesting projects and people.
- PeterStuer 13d agoForgejo user, but I do not trust Codeberg after their last "vote".
- jeremyjh 12d ago> Maybe there's some forms of clever caching involved? That could explain why the monthly expenditures seem to be moving around so much, which is unusual. Do you have a link about it? Mostly it is just better/newer hardware for the database servers - both CPU & NVME storage. But also more hosts, that are not sharing system resources, and have sub-ms latency between each other. Yes, costs change as hardware is added. But this leads to another advantage which is hard to understate: It is very easy for Codefloe to adapt its hosting architecture because everything is managed with infrastructure as code. So as bottlenecks are found, improvements are benchmarked, change can be deployed safely and reliably. Codeberg is much riskier to change at this point. Some of this is public here[1] - but I don't really expect it to convince you. What should convince you, is simply using Codeberg. It feels like being on dial-up. [1] https://pat-s.me/codefloe-launch/#takeaways-from-my-time-with-codeberg https://pat-s.me/codefloe-launch/#takeaways-from-my-time-wit...
- selfhoster1312 12d agoThanks, that's a very good article! I don't understand why it's not set front and center on the codefloe homepage.