6 ms·
The cynic in me thinks: most of the things on that list are most easily acquired if you have money.
by Detrytus 12d ago
The cynic in me thinks: most of the things on that list are most easily acquired if you have money.
- arcfour 12d agoMost of them are also easily pissed away if you have money. It cuts both ways.
- seizethecheese 12d ago“People who love you back” is harder if you truly have money.
- zelphirkalt 11d agoI think often it takes time to build relationships with others, so that they can love you back. And that is much easier, when you have a lot of money. What's more is, many people looking for a partner are looking for a social step upwards, and these days the perceived social level is a lot about money. You got no job and no income? Good luck finding a partner! In that situation you usually simply aren't given even a chance to build a relationship. Cut off before there is even a chance for the other person to love you back. Money also enables you to have many great shared memories more easily than in other ways. That wonderful vacation trip you shared to your partner's $dream-location costs money. Traveling simply costs money, but can also be a chance to get out of a dead sea and meet people who think differently and behave differently, which might more align with you. The only risk is, if others find out about your money and want you for your money. Other than that I don't see how having more money would reduce your chances of having people who love you back.
- Avicebron 12d agoWell yea, it's the luxury that underpins most of the other ones on this list. The real luxury is not having to worry about money so you can focus on things like this. A luxury that is increasingly out of reach..
- tonyedgecombe 11d agoEverybody worries about money no matter how much they have got. I remember some study where people were asked how much they would need to feel comfortable. No matter where they were on the wealth scale the answer was always about 50% more than they have now.
- Anamon 6d agoI don't subscribe to that absolute of "everybody". Counter-example: me. I define enough money as not having to worry how to pay rent, bills and food, and being able to do spontaneous purchases without thinking too much about if I can afford it. I'm at that point with my medium-high middle-class income, and I don't want to earn more. I probably wouldn't refuse if it was offered to me, but having more money than I do now would also very likely make me feel very guilty. I don't need more, and I'm already in an incredibly luxurious position that I feel pretty conflicted about because of how much it was all down to luck. I suspect most of my best friends, who are predominantly about as not-rich-but-comfortable as me, feel similarly. Otherwise we probably wouldn't be such good friends.
- chasing 12d agoMaybe. But I can think of some very wealthy people who do not have these luxuries.
- b3lvedere 12d agoI humbly disagree a bit. Most items on that list do not have to cost a lot of money (besides a washing machine and a dishwasher) and some of them cannot be bought. It is also a mindset. I adore slow weekends.
- _ink_ 12d agoSure, but it also depends how much money you need, which is in your control to a certain degree.
- cafebeen 12d agoI agree, for at least some listed, though many people blow past the amount of money actually needed. Money starts as a proxy measure for attaining these things, but it eventually replaces them as the goal, per Goodhart's law.