6 ms·
> it could be nothing. Well... no, it won't be nothing - it will be something. And I'm all ears for a plausible explanation, so fire away. All we do know is
by qarl2 11d ago
> it could be nothing.
Well... no, it won't be nothing - it will be something. And I'm all ears for a plausible explanation, so fire away.
All we do know is that in other situations, agents did use it to communicate. So that's not a grand narrative, right? It's already been seen behavior.
So what do you think explains it, besides the already seen and verified explanation?
- rdedev 11d agoMy specific contention is on trying to ascribe intention on what looks like gibberish. > Well... no, it won't be nothing - it will be something. And I'm all ears for a plausible explanation, so fire away. I'm just stating the null hypothesis that it's nothing. Especially since the agents were talking in clear english before and exchanging ideas
- qarl 10d agoSo you think there is no reason they did it? I have never seen an agent perform an action repeatedly/persistently for no reason. Have you?