5 ms·
The reality of the situation is if you don’t embrace degrowth principles, the planet will probably do it for you. Think mega-wildfores that cause so much devast
by lukeify 11d ago
The reality of the situation is if you don’t embrace degrowth principles, the planet will probably do it for you. Think mega-wildfores that cause so much devastation that hundreds of thousands of people die from air pollution, or collapse of entire crops and food supply chains due to drought, or mega-heatwaves that wipe out millions.
Degrowth is coming. And you don’t have a say in the matter.
- ch4s3 11d agoMost of these large wildfires are started by people and a result of bad land management in the form of stopping small fires in fire adapted landscapes. Moreover meddling in insurance markets and NIMBYism causes people to build in burn zones. There just aren’t mega heatwaves causing famines and there won’t be at 1.5c of warming either.
- lukeify 11d agoNone of that changes that we now have substantially larger and less controllable fires than we used to. Are you really denying that extreme weather and droughts don’t play a part in dramatically increasing combustibility? > There just aren’t mega heatwaves causing famines and there won’t be at 1.5c of warming either. Oh we’re going way past 1.5C.
- ch4s3 8d agoClearly heat and droughts are an issue and contributing factor, but land use is easily controllable relative to atmospheric CO2. > Oh we’re going way past 1.5C. Are we? The IPCC projects that no change in public policy or tecchnological advancement globally has us on track fro 2.6C rise by 2100, but there's a straightforward path to 1.8C. Experts no longer think the old worst case scenarios are plausible. Yes, 2.6C is nothing to scoff at, but it's in the realm of adaptable.
- lukeify 8d ago2.6°C is indeed way past 1.5°C, yeah. It won't stop there either.