5 ms·

I used to date a girl who was a designer and had to plead with her that breaking behaviors I'm used to is not a positive UX. "But it adds motion" was the class

• bluGill 11d ago
  The question is, are we doing this page for the sake of art or are we doing this for the sake of spreading and sharing information? These are two different domains with different requirements as to how the page works. There is nothing wrong with art. It is a great thing, I hope to see more art in the world. However, if the goal is sharing information, which is supposedly the goal of a fairly large number of websites, art needs to be secondary to sharing that information. And then those things that add motion, whatever: you're adding art and harming the real purpose.
  • PinkSheep 11d ago
    Allow me to put it more bluntly: if you are feeling like an artist, don't meddle with UX. The comment above shows this type of people don't understand it. Yet they are the ones getting hired due to formal qualification. Those who do are at the intersection of design, engineering and computer science. The latter give you enough experience to understand the culture to recreate familiar _look and feel_.
• ssl-3 11d ago
  That's exactly what I want from a website that's full of static information: Motion.