18 ms·
Regardless of that, these don't seen to play for the same audience. Codeberg Terms of Use[^0] makes it clear that it's only for "projects covered by a licence
by imrehg 12d ago
Regardless of that, these don't seen to play for the same audience.
Codeberg Terms of Use[^0] makes it clear that it's only for "projects covered by a licence for free and open source software, free and open source hardware, or free cultural works", and "You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools". They also only provide private repos where the FOSS system need it for their infra or what not, and not just for any purpose.
These are totally fine for Codeberg to do, and it's wonderful for FOSS!!
However it is not a viable place for many projects that are on GitHub/GitLab now and would want to migrate, say: any commercial project, that would need "permission-free" private repos, or when the teams want to decided themselves how much generative AI their developers should use, not their Git-hosting provider...
So yeah, different ballpark.
[0]: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/src/branch/main/TermsOfUse.md https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/src/branch/main/TermsOfUse...
- VCFundedGenYer 11d agoNot a problem if you don't ask a robot to write code for you.
- bsoqk 11d agoThey also don’t allow code about cryptocurrencies. They are strongly ideology-focused and it’s a matter of time they ban something you want to upload.
- ragall 11d agoThat's entirely fine.
- mrldkgkskld 11d agoLegally it’s fine to discriminate against some things, yes. Morally, that’s not very clear, it might actually not be entirely fine.
- ragall 10d agoIt actually, clearly, is.
- sneak 11d agoNo, the general concept of arbitrary censorship by web hosts isn’t fine at all.
- ragall 10d agoThis isn't arbitrary and isn't censorship, you moron.
- sneak 10d agoHow is it not? A platform deciding on a whim what sort of content can get your hosted site banned? That’s the definition of arbitrary and the definition of censorship. It’s not government censorship, but it’s censorship nonetheless.
- ragall 9d agoIt's not "on a whim", it's clearly and publicly documented. That's not censorship.
- allarm 3d agoit is. It's incredibly funny to watch you try to avoid being associated with certain negative things, while at the same time they're doing exactly what, by definition, those things are - in the literal sense. at least be brave enough to admit that yeah, that's censorship and this is exactly what you want.
- hexfish 11d agopushin's home page does mention that they 'block slop'. I wonder who decides what slop is, and how?
- jeremyjh 11d agoThey mean AI spam PRs.