5 ms·

It takes true corporate dedication to publish technical thought leadership on a page that actively fights your ability to read it.

larodi 11d ago
"The seat license isn't what hurts, it's the tokens." not X, but Y... so this is very likely Opus 5 text, given timing and how it reads. has all the marks of it, one being very weird wording which makes it so hard to read the text.
- ssivark 11d ago
  ...the remaining 10% of their Claude usage ;-) > modes are the load-bearing piece: Okay, this write-up is filled with Claudisms.
  - deleted 11d ago
    [deleted]
  - larodi 11d ago
    also: - listing modes - this gate, other gate - canonical stuff etc. would've been nice if Claude produces such output now and then. with 4 agents doing my stuff on a daily basis, I feel like vomiting at some point, not mere nausea, but disgust. damn Codex seems to fare better at this imho. curiously I've tried many times to instruct it to not produce this nonsense, but _deus ex machina_ always finds a way around it. wonder if these "instructions" are actually treated as restrictions, rather than... mere obstacles. like - you can try to plumb a river, it always finds its way around plumbing.
thirtygeo 11d ago
AI;dr
- HPsquared 11d ago
  Too LLMy; didn't read
hotelsacher 11d ago
Corporate dedication has been replaced by slop generators, as promised. They did say they'd make all the jobs obsolete.
- schainks 11d ago
  "schloperators" for short, right?
andrew_mason1 11d ago
I don't get why all your replies are on the AI language. Yeah the AI-isms suck and are obvious but is no one else bothered by how this page scrolls?
- schainks 11d ago
  Custom scroll implementation just screams AI schlop on top of the schlop that's on the page.
- larodi 11d ago
  well author could've tried to read it himself, and figuring it reads as slop to ... like rewrite it by hand? how hard is this, I mean - I understand reasoning took place inside a box (like it does so when you query DuckDB or Excel spreadsheets and we're okay with it), but I don't understand why anyone would think it is okay to toss glossed random shit at everyone else, and pretend it is a high-profile high-stakes writing. this whole text is barely comprehensible. not that I didn't try...

larodi 11d ago

"The seat license isn't what hurts, it's the tokens." not X, but Y... so this is very likely Opus 5 text, given timing and how it reads. has all the marks of it, one being very weird wording which makes it so hard to read the text.

ssivark 11d ago
...the remaining 10% of their Claude usage ;-) > modes are the load-bearing piece: Okay, this write-up is filled with Claudisms.
- deleted 11d ago
  [deleted]
- larodi 11d ago
  also: - listing modes - this gate, other gate - canonical stuff etc. would've been nice if Claude produces such output now and then. with 4 agents doing my stuff on a daily basis, I feel like vomiting at some point, not mere nausea, but disgust. damn Codex seems to fare better at this imho. curiously I've tried many times to instruct it to not produce this nonsense, but _deus ex machina_ always finds a way around it. wonder if these "instructions" are actually treated as restrictions, rather than... mere obstacles. like - you can try to plumb a river, it always finds its way around plumbing.

thirtygeo 11d ago

AI;dr

HPsquared 11d ago
Too LLMy; didn't read

hotelsacher 11d ago

Corporate dedication has been replaced by slop generators, as promised. They did say they'd make all the jobs obsolete.

schainks 11d ago
"schloperators" for short, right?

andrew_mason1 11d ago

I don't get why all your replies are on the AI language. Yeah the AI-isms suck and are obvious but is no one else bothered by how this page scrolls?

schainks 11d ago
Custom scroll implementation just screams AI schlop on top of the schlop that's on the page.
larodi 11d ago
well author could've tried to read it himself, and figuring it reads as slop to ... like rewrite it by hand? how hard is this, I mean - I understand reasoning took place inside a box (like it does so when you query DuckDB or Excel spreadsheets and we're okay with it), but I don't understand why anyone would think it is okay to toss glossed random shit at everyone else, and pretend it is a high-profile high-stakes writing. this whole text is barely comprehensible. not that I didn't try...