6 ms·
It was solely UC's decision to pull the lectures rather than comply with the 36 year old law that they were already well aware of but decided of their own accor
by kube-system 12d ago
It was solely UC's decision to pull the lectures rather than comply with the 36 year old law that they were already well aware of but decided of their own accord to ignore. They never cared about being charitable, they cared about the ROI on their marketing stunt to make themselves look charitable.
- strken 12d agoGood thing we all had the ADA to protect us from free educational material distributed for cynical reasons.
- deleted 12d ago[deleted]
- kube-system 12d agoUnironically, yes. They are a government land-grant public institution that is supposed to provide services equitably to their citizens. They shouldn’t be pinching pennies to enrich their administrators. They should be held accountable for following the law and their obligations in the work they are required to do. If anyone should be setting an example for equity, or at the least following its own damn laws, it should be our government itself.