6 ms·
That means we are crossing the line and people can't tell anymore. Most likely this is the author's story enhanced with AI and then edited. That is the future
by aogaili 12d ago
That means we are crossing the line and people can't tell anymore.
Most likely this is the author's story enhanced with AI and then edited. That is the future I think.
- hlieberman 12d agoSlop is slop, whether you edit it in or whether you generate it de novo.
- Cthulhu_ 12d agoIt seems enough people appreciated the story to upvote it though... but that assumes HN's algorithm is fair, it's free of bots, and the people voting are critical and honest on what they upvote.
- aogaili 12d agoI disagree, I think this is too black and white. In my opinion, it boils down to what ideas/experiences were seeded. In this article for example, the author is clearly sharing their first-hand experience, therefore injecting observations from reality and their own reflection on top of it, and they then probably shaped/refined it with AI. A slop, as I see it, is when you generate content from a very thin prompt and then share it as is.
- fusslo 12d agoI think you're probably right Right now I have a mental block with reading ai written or ai enchanced text. So unless the article has a pre-2021 date... I'll ask ai to summarize it I think I'll eventually have to get over that bias
- goosejuice 12d ago> Right now I have a mental block with reading ai written or ai enchanced text. So unless the article has a pre-2021 date... I'll ask ai to summarize it That's uh, an interesting solution. As long as it's your LLM?
- aogaili 12d agoBut then you are reading an AI generated text as well?