You made a declarative general statement in the form of "X can not Y." I then asked you to define Y, because you can not reasonably say that "X can not Y" with

You made a declarative general statement in the form of "X can not Y." I then asked you to define Y, because you can not reasonably say that "X can not Y" without first defining both X and Y. You could not. The truth is that this conversation is pointless until someone can define both 'X' and 'Y' in ways that aren't tautological nonsense. Until then nobody can say anything with a reasonable level of certainty. This likely also applies to intelligence. Life and disease are likely simpler, though perhaps more malleable definitions.