8 ms·

Sure, fix those problems too. What you are showing is that problems exist. Clearly, work on election integrity is needed. Note that in New Jersey, bipartisan

Sure, fix those problems too. What you are showing is that problems exist. Clearly, work on election integrity is needed. Note that in New Jersey, bipartisan work is being done.

hackyhacky 13d ago
> Sure, fix those problems too. They do exist. What's interesting is that those are problems created by the same people who are currently trying to disenfranchise people through the current push to takeover state elections through the postal service. So color me skeptical of their alleged "good intentions."
- RickJWagner 13d ago
  Explain how Republicans caused the ineligible votes in New Jersey, please.
  - hackyhacky 13d ago
    > Explain how Republicans caused the ineligible votes in New Jersey, please. I never asserted that they did. Are you arguing with me or with a straw man?
    - RickJWagner 13d ago
      You wrote: “They ( problems in elections ) do exist. What's interesting is that those are problems created by the same people who are currently trying to disenfranchise people…” Under discussion was the New Jersey ineligible voter problem, to which you responded with problems in perceived over zealous voter restrictions. Clearly, not all the problems are caused by Republicans. There’s room for examination and correction in more than one place.
      - hackyhacky 13d ago
        You are (intentionally) disregarding the question of intent. The NJ issue was a software bug. It was found and fixed. No amount of big government oversight will prevent bugs, and in fact it may increase them. In contrast, the disenfranchisement in Georgia, Tennessee, and now proposed through the USPS,is fully intentional. Republican don't want legal voters to vote. The situation is not at all comparable.
        RickJWagner 11d ago
        After the Georgia ‘disenfranchisement’ Democrats won, proving all the hysteria is just hogwash. Americans of all kinds ( including minorities ) want voter ID and election security. Stop repeating DNC talking points.
        hackyhacky 10d ago
        So in your view, illegal disenfranchisement of voters is okay as long as it's insufficient to change the results of the election? By the way, Democrats did not win that election, as Georgia's Republican governor can tell you.
        RickJWagner 8d ago
        No, of course not. Illegal deisenfranchisement is a horrible thing. But we must be sane, please. After all the hysteria about Georgias election integrity measures, a Democrat ( Warnock ) won the senate seat. Federal courts ( under the Biden administration ) discredited criticisms, and 99% of Georgians reported having no trouble voting. Stop being hysterical. Here, read about it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Election_Integrity_Act_of_2021 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Election_Integrity_Act_of_2021

Sure, fix those problems too. What you are showing is that problems exist. Clearly, work on election integrity is needed. Note that in New Jersey, bipartisan work is being done.

hackyhacky 13d ago

> Sure, fix those problems too. They do exist. What's interesting is that those are problems created by the same people who are currently trying to disenfranchise people through the current push to takeover state elections through the postal service. So color me skeptical of their alleged "good intentions."

RickJWagner 13d ago
Explain how Republicans caused the ineligible votes in New Jersey, please.
- hackyhacky 13d ago
  > Explain how Republicans caused the ineligible votes in New Jersey, please. I never asserted that they did. Are you arguing with me or with a straw man?
  - RickJWagner 13d ago
    You wrote: “They ( problems in elections ) do exist. What's interesting is that those are problems created by the same people who are currently trying to disenfranchise people…” Under discussion was the New Jersey ineligible voter problem, to which you responded with problems in perceived over zealous voter restrictions. Clearly, not all the problems are caused by Republicans. There’s room for examination and correction in more than one place.
    - hackyhacky 13d ago
      You are (intentionally) disregarding the question of intent. The NJ issue was a software bug. It was found and fixed. No amount of big government oversight will prevent bugs, and in fact it may increase them. In contrast, the disenfranchisement in Georgia, Tennessee, and now proposed through the USPS,is fully intentional. Republican don't want legal voters to vote. The situation is not at all comparable.
      - RickJWagner 11d ago
        After the Georgia ‘disenfranchisement’ Democrats won, proving all the hysteria is just hogwash. Americans of all kinds ( including minorities ) want voter ID and election security. Stop repeating DNC talking points.
        hackyhacky 10d ago
        So in your view, illegal disenfranchisement of voters is okay as long as it's insufficient to change the results of the election? By the way, Democrats did not win that election, as Georgia's Republican governor can tell you.
        RickJWagner 8d ago
        No, of course not. Illegal deisenfranchisement is a horrible thing. But we must be sane, please. After all the hysteria about Georgias election integrity measures, a Democrat ( Warnock ) won the senate seat. Federal courts ( under the Biden administration ) discredited criticisms, and 99% of Georgians reported having no trouble voting. Stop being hysterical. Here, read about it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Election_Integrity_Act_of_2021 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Election_Integrity_Act_of_2021