9 ms·

Not just nutrition, over the last ~30 years there's also been a philosophical shift globally where many people went from thinking about impact on humans as the

• bcjdjsndon 14d ago
  You're talking about the common misconception that this planets ecology is somehow broken, that humans are supernatural (literally above nature) and that only other humans can fix it. I'm also assuming that you're goodwill for other species ends at insects and bacteria
  • Zarathustra30 14d ago
    DDT kills both bees and bald eagles. Let's not overuse it, even if we could grow more nutritious food if we did.
  • stirfish 14d ago
    I hope this never happens, but if one day a cell in your colon maximizes its short-term replication at the expense of the long-term stability of the system it depends on, I hope nobody tells you it's fine because it's "natural."
  • vasco 13d ago
    It definitely is easier to comment on what you make up than what was written, but don't be lazy.
  • Daishiman 9d ago
    Roundup, last I heard, is not a natural product and its worldwide impact in insect biomass is at the level of the largest mass extinctions in history. Likewise the biomass of humans and cattle have an impact that can definitely be considered at the extremes of what nature has to offer. Do you think that a 1.5C+ increase in global temperature in a century is also something typical of the natural cycles?
    • bcjdjsndon 9d ago
      > Do you think that a 1.5C+ increase in global temperature in a century is also something typical of the natural cycles? Yes. By definition, we are part of nature. But it wouldn't matter even if it wasn't, my contention is that it won't be the apocalypse it's made out to be.
      • Daishiman 8d ago
        > But it wouldn't matter even if it wasn't, my contention is that it won't be the apocalypse it's made out to be. Against the evidence of every branch of the natural sciences that studies the problem from every conceivable angle and consistently say the effects are actually going to be much worse. I don't hold it that you're the kind of person that goes out there every day pointing out issues in the ECMWF models, or telling biologists that their understanding of crop performance is actually _all wrong_ and crops will magically create new adaptability measures out of nowhere, or showing that the human body can actually stand nighttime temperatures that we already know it can't stand.
        • bcjdjsndon 8d ago
          > Against the evidence of every branch of the natural sciences that studies the problem from every conceivable angle and consistently say the effects are actually going to be much worse. I'm not talking about meteorological outcomes but sociopolitical ones like massive migrations, outbreaks of political unrest. I also think climatologists step outside their remit when they make such claims. I don't doubt 1.5c, I doubt the end of humanity
          • Daishiman 8d ago
            It's not an immediate end of humanity, it's the slowly eroding collapse of institutions. We're at 1.5 anyway so it's likely not the end, but the end is there and it's within a very likely scenario.