4 ms·
> It appears to be higher electricity prices whilst the compensation given doesn't adequately match and goes disproportionally to what's essentially a middleman
by gspr 14d ago
> It appears to be higher electricity prices whilst the compensation given doesn't adequately match and goes disproportionally to what's essentially a middleman.
Could you elaborate on this disproportionality?
> Is it then not better for the population to essentially reward it's investment in energy production and keep prices low domestically?
By the same token, we should stop exporting fish and oil – that'd be sure to lower the price of both commodities domestically.
- modo_mario 14d ago>Could you elaborate on this disproportionality? It's disproportional in that it's more than the swedish would want to give since they'd rather invest it domestically (in energy production and those prices). >By the same token, we should stop exporting fish and oil – that'd be sure to lower the price of both commodities domestically. It would and I suspect you might take issue if your consumer prices were relatively higher and you were told you could not build a sovereign wealth fund to the same extent and should instead give much of that money so the eu can build bigger pipelines so germanies prices can remain relatively low.
- gspr 12d ago> It's disproportional in that it's more than the swedish would want to give since they'd rather invest it domestically (in energy production and those prices). So what's stopping them from investing the energy locally without paying the middlemen for export? > It would and I suspect you might take issue if your consumer prices were relatively higher and you were told you could not build a sovereign wealth fund to the same extent and should instead give much of that money so the eu can build bigger pipelines so germanies prices can remain relatively low. Who's saying that they have to "give away" money?