6 ms·
In my experience, Gemini 3.7 is excellent for general non-coding tasks. But for coding, especially backend development, I still find models like Opus 5 and GPT-
by dassh 14d ago
In my experience, Gemini 3.7 is excellent for general non-coding tasks. But for coding, especially backend development, I still find models like Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 more reliable.
- antonvs 14d agoI’ve been using Gemini for coding daily since 3.5, mostly on some pretty complex ML engineering projects. It’s great. What’s an example of not being “reliable”?
- menaerus 14d agoIf I strip the dependencies out, I'm using it on a 5MLoC C++ codebase, and I found it performs really really well. I am using the Opus 5/Fable in parallel and I couldn't tell the difference. Both models make mistakes here and there.