5 ms·
The "contributor" pricing is the standout here at a ~20x discount, if you allow training on your data. The model seems on par with Sol and Opus 5 on paper (adm
by jumploops 14d ago
The "contributor" pricing is the standout here at a ~20x discount, if you allow training on your data.
The model seems on par with Sol and Opus 5 on paper (admittedly on some older/saturated benchmarks, but very competitive for $).
Stats:
1M context, $0.10 input/$0.002 cached, $0.20 output (Mtok)
- 2001zhaozhao 14d agoI have a feeling that Meta is not gonna like what people actually use the contributor model for lol. (It's probably going to be a bunch of repetitive batch jobs like web search that have no training value)
- HDBaseT 14d agoNot to mention, this is hyper competitive against even Chinese providers given its multi-modal support. Muse Spark 1.3 supports Text, Image, Video, File, Audio inputs. We've only started to see models from China include image and video inputs recently.
- a012 14d agoMuse Spark may be competitive in capabilities but it’s not for serious works since Meta trains on your prompts so no ZDR, in contrast Chinese provider like Z.AI promises ZDR which is more attractive to big corps.
- sourcecodeplz 14d agolol of all people you think the Chinese will not log your queries?
- cheema33 14d ago> in contrast Chinese provider like Z.AI promises ZDR I do not trust any provider, US or Chinese when they say they will not train on my data. I still use these services, but I am under no illusion that any of these people are trustworthy bunch.
- adrian_b 13d agoAnother poster has pointed to a statement by Mark Zuckerberg that they will release soon Muse Spark as open weights. While I agree with you for the Muse Spark as hosted by Meta, if it will be available in open weights form for self hosting, then there are good chances that it can become quite useful.
- iAMkenough 13d agoI’m not sure why I’d use theirs over the other open weights out there, or what profit motive Meta has.