4 ms·
model card https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49537354 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49537354 (doesn't 404)
by sva_ 14d ago
model card https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49537354 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49537354 (doesn't 404)
- mattlondon 14d agoAlso https://web.archive.org/web/20260902150007/https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-8-Flash-Model-Card.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20260902150007/https://storage.g... in case it goes again
- Barbing 14d ago[1] For tone and instruction following, a positive percentage increase represents an improvement in the tone of the model on sensitive topics and the model’s ability to follow instructions while remaining safe compared to Gemini 3 Flash. We mark improvements in green and regressions in red. Gemini 3 Flash?! So is Gemini 3.8 Flash less safe than 3.7 Flash in all areas besides Text to Text Safety (and identical on Image to Text Safety)? Why bother with a column “Gemini 3.8 Flash vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash” when you’re going to disregard the label for 20% of it? Also is the “Tone” label short for “Tone and Instruction Following”? Chartcrime, the major AI lab tradition.