7 ms·
Perhaps it's better to ponder whether or not it contains information useful to you / is a pleasure to read?
by comboy 14d ago
Perhaps it's better to ponder whether or not it contains information useful to you / is a pleasure to read?
- carb 14d agoAI-prose may be vetted, but there is no way for a reader to know that for certain as much AI-prose is not. As such, you cannot be sure if the writing contains correct and accurate information at all, even with modern models.
- comboy 14d ago> you cannot be sure if the writing contains correct and accurate information at all how is that related to LLMs?
- carb 5d agoDue to their past, LLMs need to prove themselves as correct and accurate. Bloggers have already gone through this gauntlet and have proven to be more likely to be correct and accurate. Neither are a guarantee.
- Aachen 14d agoYeah, and there is no pleasure reading this. It's way too long and verbose for what it's trying to say. I'd much rather read the prompt, in bullet points or whatever format they were provided before inflating a few example pictures and notes into a short novel
- mhb 14d agoHow is this criticism not just ad hominem slop? You could have said "It's way too long and verbose for what it's trying to say". The writer is orthogonal.
- throwawaysoxjje 14d agoThe idea that the writer is orthogonal is WILD
- mhb 14d agoBecause you think you're always going to be able to tell the difference between AI writing and human writing? That's WILD!
- appleappleapple 14d agoMaybe I’m a Luddite but I find AI prose completely tiresome to read, and its presence in an article forces me to be skeptical about whatever the author wrote. The latter was obviously a problem pre-AI but these tools simply make it much easier to tell stories, narratives, etc. that aren’t yours.
- relevant_stats 14d agoThe heavy usage of LLM writing as is the case here is a strong signal it doesn't and isn't. I won't waste my time on a person who didn't bother to express themselves.