6 ms·

It's even more fatiguing to see so many comments about whether something is LLM-written or human-written. I hope we get past this stage, soon.

• abirch 15d ago
  Is it worth a human reading it or not? There are many, insipid human-writers (me included). Historically I got a lot of value of reading info posted on HN.
• Krssst 15d ago
  I don't want to read LLM written text (EDIT: just replying to parent comment, not implying at all that the tutorial might be written that way; it definitely does not look like it). It would be nice if people could just disclose when they used LLMs for their writing and how, then people who care can skip and people who don't can read. Of course this would have to come with not shaming the people who disclose actual use of LLM, otherwise we're back to square one.
  • samaaron 15d ago
    For the record I didn’t use LLMs to write this tutorial.
    • Krssst 15d ago
      Ah, sorry, I was only replying to the above comment but did not mean to imply that the tutorial might be AI-written; it very much looks human-written and generally a nice read :-)
• latexr 14d ago
  I hope we don’t, or that if we do it’s because either it has become impossible to hide or everyone became honest about it. Tons of conversations are fatiguing, such as climate change, the rise of totalitarianism, the erosion of rights, mass surveillance… These conversations will only cease when we fix the problems or give up on trying to fix them. I feel your pain, I too am fatigued at these. But I’d rather criticise the ones causing the problem than the ones pointing it out.