7 ms·

The enterprise sounds accurate. You mention performance issues with Git, but there are performance issues with this blog post.

steveklabnik 15d ago
What is your browser/OS combo? I am assuming it's the animation, we tested it thoroughly but there can always be bugs. Thank you for bringing it up!
- pwdisswordfishq 15d ago
  Firefox on Linux
- NoDodgeQuestion 15d ago
  Windows, Chrome, fans spin, recommend ai review
  - steveklabnik 15d ago
    Thanks, I'm a Windows user and use Chrome myself, and on my machine it works great, but it's a pretty beefy box. I mentioned this downthread to someone else, but I've filed a bug internally and we'll make sure that it's better optimized. Thank you for the report, it's truly helpful.
saghm 15d ago
If the worst thing you can say about a git hosting provider is that the performance of their blog is worse than the performance of their git servers, I think they're probably doing an okay job.
- pwdisswordfishq 14d ago
  > the worst thing you can say about a git hosting provider is that the performance of their blog is worse than the performance of their git servers No one has agreed to this premise. You have invented it out of nowhere.
  - saghm 14d ago
    I'd argue that you invented some sort of link between "performance of git" and "performance of websites" that is not at all a premise I accept either, so it's not that unreasonable for me to point out that I think it's silly.
- steveklabnik 15d ago
  While this is true, we do care about performance tremendously, and the animation not having good performance cuts against that, so I think it's a very fair criticism. Paying attention to details matters.
  - saghm 14d ago
    That's reasonable. I mostly just found the framing to be unfair rather than the criticism itself; it feels kind of disingenuous to try to draw a connection between performance of git and performance of a webpage IMO

steveklabnik 15d ago

What is your browser/OS combo? I am assuming it's the animation, we tested it thoroughly but there can always be bugs. Thank you for bringing it up!

pwdisswordfishq 15d ago
Firefox on Linux
NoDodgeQuestion 15d ago
Windows, Chrome, fans spin, recommend ai review
- steveklabnik 15d ago
  Thanks, I'm a Windows user and use Chrome myself, and on my machine it works great, but it's a pretty beefy box. I mentioned this downthread to someone else, but I've filed a bug internally and we'll make sure that it's better optimized. Thank you for the report, it's truly helpful.

saghm 15d ago

If the worst thing you can say about a git hosting provider is that the performance of their blog is worse than the performance of their git servers, I think they're probably doing an okay job.

pwdisswordfishq 14d ago
> the worst thing you can say about a git hosting provider is that the performance of their blog is worse than the performance of their git servers No one has agreed to this premise. You have invented it out of nowhere.
- saghm 14d ago
  I'd argue that you invented some sort of link between "performance of git" and "performance of websites" that is not at all a premise I accept either, so it's not that unreasonable for me to point out that I think it's silly.
steveklabnik 15d ago
While this is true, we do care about performance tremendously, and the animation not having good performance cuts against that, so I think it's a very fair criticism. Paying attention to details matters.
- saghm 14d ago
  That's reasonable. I mostly just found the framing to be unfair rather than the criticism itself; it feels kind of disingenuous to try to draw a connection between performance of git and performance of a webpage IMO