6 ms·

Ugh, people are still saying the Codex limits are more generous. They're not, Claude's are over 2x higher, have been for months! [1] It's just that Claude uses

Ugh, people are still saying the Codex limits are more generous. They're not, Claude's are over 2x higher, have been for months! [1] It's just that Claude uses far more tokens, 2-3x is common. Except sometimes GPT will use just as many or even go into a compact loop and then your quota is gone, little headroom for hard tasks. [1] https://devforth.io/agents-for-code/?sortby=monthly-value https://devforth.io/agents-for-code/?sortby=monthly-value And I can confirm the numbers, I subscribe to both and watch the numbers

stevego7 16d ago
Yeah I subscribe to both and watch the numbers too, and it drives me nuts Who wants to actually watch anyways, rather than worry about it my team just created our own harness that prioritize usage + intelligence and assigns work out (and records token usage..) https://go7workhorse.com https://go7workhorse.com Still beta, please try it and give me feedback.
trentor 17d ago
I don't get it. It's the same result.
isoprophlex 17d ago
No no our coffee is not more expensive! The serving sizes are just smaller!
import 17d ago
Well at the end of the day, I can finish more work with the codex limits.
re-thc 17d ago
> people are still saying the Codex limits are more generous. They're not They are if you follow Tibo on the resets.
seaurchinzee 17d ago
That website seems to suggest that Opus 5 spends ~57 cents per task, while GPT 5.6 Sol spends ~49 cents per task? That ratio doesn't feel quite right to me. Artificial Analysis says Opus 5 High costs nearly ~3x as much as GPT 5.6 Sol High for a given task: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/comparisons/claude-opus-5-high-vs-gpt-5-6-sol-high https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/comparisons/claude-opus...