10 ms·
They haven't really mentioned practically anything about Haiku in quite a while so I imagine nobody except for people inside Anthropic will have any indication.
by Jcampuzano2 15d ago
They haven't really mentioned practically anything about Haiku in quite a while so I imagine nobody except for people inside Anthropic will have any indication.
Maybe it'll come out eventually but they don't even include it on some of their comparison benchmarks anymore, so I figure its very low priority for them.
- wahnfrieden 15d agoMore likely that they are embarrassed by how their attempts compare with OpenAI's Haiku analog, Luna.
- ayewo 15d agoNot so sure since Anthropic has 4 model families while OpenAI has 3 for GPT-5.6. Claude Fable/Mythos vs GPT-5.6 Sol Claude Opus vs GPT-5.6 Terra Claude Sonnet vs GPT-5.6 Luna Claude Haiku vs ?
- HDBaseT 15d agoThe pricing on Luna is just insanely good. Haiku simply cannot compete at almost any intelligence level against DeepSeek V4 Flash or Luna.
- wahnfrieden 15d agoNo, you're off by one - likely because the OpenAI models punch above their weight in those comparison, hence my original message. You've shifted the comparisons to favor Anthropic. Fable/Mythos are much larger than Sol. They match to Astra which is supposedly at least 10T. Astra is already publicly confirmed as a new family. Opus matches to Sol. Sonnet to Terra. Haiku to Luna. Anthropic is able to compete at the frontier high-end by launching massively large expensive models. But their inability to compete on small models belies their efficiency aspirations across the stack.