6 ms·
Cambridge in the UK tried it. They promised to improve the bus service only after introducing the charge. It didn’t go over well. And even for a small city li
by bartread 15d ago
Cambridge in the UK tried it. They promised to improve the bus service only after introducing the charge.
It didn’t go over well.
And even for a small city like Cambridge it is a huge lift to go from an already inadequate public transport infrastructure and set of services to infrastructure and services suitable for a city where cars have been largely eliminated.
The irony of course is that bus services, specifically the guided busway, will be cut again soon due to ongoing lack of use. But the lack of use has been caused by long-running and poorly managed maintenance on the busway disrupting services to the point of unusability, rather than because of any real lack of demand.
Some people didn’t trust that promises would be delivered on public transport when it came to the congestion charge. Obviously cuts like this add fuel to that fire.
On a more positive note we have, over the past 10 years or so, gained two new railway stations, and that’s good. But we haven’t gained new rail lines and rail routes so they haven’t done anything really to improve the transport and congestion situations around the city. It’s easier and more convenient to get to London though, depending on where you are.
- dfxm12 15d agoA web search surfacing contemporary newspaper articles suggests this congestion charge was proposed, but never actually implemented.
- bartread 15d agoThat's correct. I said they tried it, as in tried to introduce it. It was never actually introduced. It is quite likely to be tried again in future.