> When you are outdoors, especially on public property, you generally have no "expectation of privacy." what about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpenter_v._U

> When you are outdoors, especially on public property, you generally have no "expectation of privacy." what about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpenter_v._United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpenter_v._United_States? > A person does not surrender all Fourth Amendment protection by venturing into the public sphere ~ John Roberts I do get the separation from private companies and government. I'm not arguing that. But this ruling was specifically about using Cell data collected by a private company being used to violate the privacy rights of citizens. I don't think a private company harvesting data from public spaces and then reselling it is loop-hole enough to say "press rights > privacy rights". And there's precedence from the SCOTUS to support my belief on that.