4 ms·
> shouldn't we focus on human accessibility first? This is the big question for designers, how much of the future of software will be human-oriented UIs vs a h
by dmix 19d ago
> shouldn't we focus on human accessibility first?
This is the big question for designers, how much of the future of software will be human-oriented UIs vs a human typing into a chat window (or as a temporary bridge, telling an agent to operate existing GUIs).
For now I believe agent-driven software is still pretty niche, something for highly technical users, but that will change as it mainstreams. Early adopters demand early adopter software features.
- nasso_dev 19d agoa chat window is actually HORRIBLE for many tasks. i really strongly hope this isn't what the future of software looks like there is just no way a chat interface could replace a non-linear video editor gui
- _joel 19d agoI would assume it would be for driving via agentic means, more AI video slop.
- phatskat 19d ago> a chat window is actually HORRIBLE for many tasks. i really strongly hope this isn't what the future of software looks like I strongly concur - I don't want to "tell" the app to level the audio between several clips only to have it level everything to 0 and then take five minutes to undo etc
- dmix 18d agoEveryone always views it through the current UX when I say stuff like this. The way I see it is we're in the DOS/UNIX era of LLMs where you're just staring at an empty text input box, it's slow, breaks often, GUI integrations are non-existent or primitive, etc.
- dmix 18d agoIt's not a replacement for sure. There's no way it could be a full replacement for visual UIs.