The person was not charged with destruction of evidence, rather destruction of property to prevent a seizure. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscou

The person was not charged with destruction of evidence, rather destruction of property to prevent a seizure. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.351975/gov.uscourts.gand.351975.1.0.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.35... To be charged with destruction of evidence, the data contained in the device has to be justified as such. It appears this was not the case, note this person was not indicted or accused of anything else too.