4 ms·

I don't, please enlighten me.

• lokar 18d ago
  My prediction is that many new contributors would complain loudly. Some existing contributors would sympathize. It’s I think a normal evolution of a social norm. There will be a period of competing values.
• CamperBob2 18d ago
  Explain, in at most 300 characters, why we should merge your change, or at least why we should invest the time to read a longer explanation (somethings things ARE complex) would simply become a prompt. The solution, of course, is to use the best available LLMs as the first line of defense against slop contributions. But if the project maintainers have issued a sweeping fatwa prohibiting an entire class of useful tools, that option along with many others is off the table.
  • tiahura 18d ago
    I wonder if some of these projects with ayatollah maintainers are looking at forks sooner rather than later?
• Keyframe 18d ago
  people would use LLMS for those summaries, defeating the purpose. You can already see it in PRs in companies where LLM code is pushed.