7 ms·
At this point, who could bring a copyright claim? Well, considering the massive AI training effort hoovering everything up, seems it might be approximately ever
by jfoster 18d ago
At this point, who could bring a copyright claim? Well, considering the massive AI training effort hoovering everything up, seems it might be approximately everyone.
Who would they be making the claim against? Well, considering the massive uptake of AI across the tech industry & beyond... approximately everyone.
Yes, the model companies are in the middle, but it's getting to the point where it seems a bit doubtful that claims will have any significant outcomes.
NYT might be able to get OpenAI to pay them for their content, but that's more of a financial tweak than a up-ending of industry.
- dfxm12 18d agoDifferent models have different licensing. Maybe open ai or anthropic doesn't claim ownership of output today, but some companies do. https://www.recraft.ai/docs/trust-and-security/ownership https://www.recraft.ai/docs/trust-and-security/ownership I imagine few can afford a legal battle... Free plan Images generated on the Free plan are public and owned by Recraft
- jfoster 17d agoFeels like those kinds of terms are moot in the big picture. Could they enforce it? Perhaps they can if a significant amount of the data produced is their IP, but who would they enforce it against? Consumers? Not much to be gained by going after them. I can only think that they are hoping businesses might use the free plan and that they can sell them paid plans as part of an enforcement effort, but it doesn't seem like a very sustainable approach given the industry standard is to not claim ownership.