7 ms·
We do not need Flock in this current iteration of society. In utopia, we would also not need Flock. Privacy should be a human right.
by hightrix 19d ago
We do not need Flock in this current iteration of society.
In utopia, we would also not need Flock.
Privacy should be a human right.
- consumer451 19d agoAgreed. I now realize that my initial comment did not make my position clear.
- Gigachad 19d agoWe don’t _need_ many things. But there are real problems that it solves and solves better than anything else. I feel like the best solution is very tightly regulating and auditing this technology so it can only be used to benefit society.
- consumer451 19d agoWe are so far away from that even being a possibility. We live in a world that is most corrupt and above the law, at the very top. Why would anyone trust that world? Trust is required for this technology to be willingly adopted.
- queenkjuul 17d ago> We don’t _need_ many things. But there are real problems that it solves and solves better than anything else. I really don't believe this, nor do i believe any amount of regulation will actually prevent dipshit US cops from abusing it
- georgemcbay 17d ago> But there are real problems that it solves and solves better than anything else. Like when a cop wants to stalk his ex-girlfriend, or ex-wife. Who else is gonna solve this problem if not flock?
- Gigachad 16d agoThat’s what the auditing needs to cover. Every search should be tied to a case number and the police putting in fake numbers to stalk people need to be dealt with.
- hightrix 16d ago> But there are real problems that it solves and solves better than anything else. I disagree. What problems does it solve better than anything else? Any examples? The best solution is to NOT LIVE IN A SURVEILLANCE STATE.