5 ms·
> Isn't this just a proof that there are many unnamed things, but no unnameable ones? Where is it a proof that there are many unnamed things ? I could only see
by bwfan123 19d ago
> Isn't this just a proof that there are many unnamed things, but no unnameable ones?
Where is it a proof that there are many unnamed things ? I could only see it as an argument that there are no "unnameable" things.
- curtisblaine 19d agoIt depends how you define "named", but for example, not all the grain of sands you see on a beach are named (yes, they are named collectively, but not individually. If "collectively" is valid, then that's further proof that "unnameable" things can't exist, because they already have a collective name).