6 ms·
> raised three separate PRs to correct spelling and grammar mistakes in comments. > The changes were harmless and correct, > I closed all three PRs without co
by jarym 20d ago
> raised three separate PRs to correct spelling and grammar mistakes in comments.
> The changes were harmless and correct,
> I closed all three PRs without comment.
What is this article? I get real ‘AI slop PRs’ are nightmares - but I take that to mean the wave of AI generated PRs that read convincingly but are in the end bullshit.
But your example is NOT that. The unreasonable counter to your point: don’t make spelling mistakes in the first place? Or switch off PRs if you don’t want things corrected?
- hypfer 20d agoThere is a statistically significant correlation between comments on HN not getting the point and a GitHub user existing under the same moniker with a default pfp and no content.
- jarym 20d agoWhat are you talking about? My GH profile is not my HN name. If you don’t have a valid point why post rubbish?
- hypfer 20d agoI think everything is said here already, but there's still yet another interesting detail worth mentioning. Reading the tea leaves, this initially said NH instead of HN, which might be a typo, but might also be "hacker news" but in the native language. Which would possibly line up with commit messages. Anyway, low trust internet is here. Enjoy
- jarym 20d agoLow trust or not, we still have to deal with trolls.