6 ms·

very off topic, but i've always wondered whether 'nother' was an acceptable word to use.

lawl 14y ago
no native english speaker here, but i guess "a whole 'nother" would be correct. but let people be lazy when typing online. actually i guess you'd also need to switch the words to be gramatically correct: "another whole year"
- neltnerb 14y ago
  native english speaker here, and I grant that english is flexible enough that such things are largely a matter of opinion, but "nother" bugs me. I would write 'other with the apostrophe used to indicate the mixing of "a whole other" and "another" into 'other. I would pronounce it "other" if I was thinking, but possibly "nother" if I was being sloppy.
  - 46Bit 14y ago
    It works in speech, but makes no sense in writing. 'nother is more confusing and awkward to write that another.
    - yaddayadda 14y ago
      It makes sense if the intended interpretation is the same as the spoken version.
    - jwoah12 14y ago
      I cringe when I hear people say this. It works in speech to the extent that "irregardless" or "I could care less" are acceptable.
      - 46Bit 14y ago
        > I cringe when I hear people say this. It works in speech to the extent that "irregardless" or "I could care less" are acceptable. I'm not sure where you're from, but in Yorkshire you'd end up saying such things yourself before long. What matters is comprehension, and whilst writing to an audience means you need to ensure clarity, the same concerns are less applicable to chatting to a lifelong friend.
  - hdctambien 14y ago
    I never thought about this until now, but I think this is a case of an interfix. So, it is turning "another" in to "a-whole-nother" much like "abso-f*ing-lutely" or "legend-and-I-hope-you're-not-lactose-intolerant-because-the-second-half-of-that-word-is-DAIRY!"
    - hythloday 14y ago
      Technically it's not an interfix (interfices don't have a semantic meaning) but a tmesis.
kolektiv 14y ago
It seems like a horrible mangling of syntax. I don't see why you wouldn't simply say "...another whole year of experience..."
pc86 14y ago
It most certainly is not. It's up there with "irregardless," "supposably," and "pacifically/the Specific Ocean." If you're a native English speaker there is absolutely no excuse for that kind of ignorance.
JohnHaugeland 14y ago
It is not strictly correct, but it is firmly planted in the trenches of programmer linguistic games (qv the jargon file.)

lawl 14y ago

no native english speaker here, but i guess "a whole 'nother" would be correct. but let people be lazy when typing online. actually i guess you'd also need to switch the words to be gramatically correct: "another whole year"

neltnerb 14y ago
native english speaker here, and I grant that english is flexible enough that such things are largely a matter of opinion, but "nother" bugs me. I would write 'other with the apostrophe used to indicate the mixing of "a whole other" and "another" into 'other. I would pronounce it "other" if I was thinking, but possibly "nother" if I was being sloppy.
- 46Bit 14y ago
  It works in speech, but makes no sense in writing. 'nother is more confusing and awkward to write that another.
  - yaddayadda 14y ago
    It makes sense if the intended interpretation is the same as the spoken version.
  - jwoah12 14y ago
    I cringe when I hear people say this. It works in speech to the extent that "irregardless" or "I could care less" are acceptable.
    - 46Bit 14y ago
      > I cringe when I hear people say this. It works in speech to the extent that "irregardless" or "I could care less" are acceptable. I'm not sure where you're from, but in Yorkshire you'd end up saying such things yourself before long. What matters is comprehension, and whilst writing to an audience means you need to ensure clarity, the same concerns are less applicable to chatting to a lifelong friend.
- hdctambien 14y ago
  I never thought about this until now, but I think this is a case of an interfix. So, it is turning "another" in to "a-whole-nother" much like "abso-f*ing-lutely" or "legend-and-I-hope-you're-not-lactose-intolerant-because-the-second-half-of-that-word-is-DAIRY!"
  - hythloday 14y ago
    Technically it's not an interfix (interfices don't have a semantic meaning) but a tmesis.

kolektiv 14y ago

It seems like a horrible mangling of syntax. I don't see why you wouldn't simply say "...another whole year of experience..."

pc86 14y ago

It most certainly is not. It's up there with "irregardless," "supposably," and "pacifically/the Specific Ocean." If you're a native English speaker there is absolutely no excuse for that kind of ignorance.

JohnHaugeland 14y ago

It is not strictly correct, but it is firmly planted in the trenches of programmer linguistic games (qv the jargon file.)