> Neither capitalism as a system nor corporations have an obligation to improve quality of life for their employees beyond their market value If by capitalism

> Neither capitalism as a system nor corporations have an obligation to improve quality of life for their employees beyond their market value If by capitalism as a system, we are refering to countries that are capitalists, it seems fairly uncontroversial to say that such countries can prioritize their own citizens. It is not weird or controversial to say that countries, even capitalist ones, prioritize their citizens in certain cases, nor is it weird to suggest that they aught do so. > which is weird because you're arguing that capitalist companies need to prioritize "citizen" labor in order to reduce unemployment, or that governments need to force them to. I am suggesting that it is compatible with being a capitalist country, and is not weird, unusually, or bad to do such a common thing as prioritizing your own citizens. I wouldn't say that they need to. Merely that it is a normal and compatible, and in many cases desirable goal for said citizens.