That (6 justices in) the Supreme Court is > repeatedly interfering in the elections this year is not an exaggeration [1]: > If a year out is “too close” for

That (6 justices in) the Supreme Court is > repeatedly interfering in the elections this year is not an exaggeration [1]: > If a year out is “too close” for a federal court to act in Texas, what’s the argument for the Supreme Court’s May 4 ruling issuing the judgment immediately in Callais, or its May 11 ruling issuing a GVR in the Alabama cases? [1] https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/231-the-death-of-purcells-principle https://www.stevevladeck.com/p/231-the-death-of-purcells-pri...